![]() "Obviously, we are very concerned about this."īut criticism of the UCP is nothing new. "This is the first time I have seen or heard that," said one staffer in the office of Senate Armed Service Committee Chairman Sen. It was the first time Natick officials have publically pointed the finger at PEO Soldier and Army leaders, charging that UCP cost taxpayers billions in uniforms and matching body armor, backpacks and other equipment.Ĭongressional officials said they were surprised to see Natick scientists quoted directly questioning the Army's decision to adopt the pattern. The second option would be to make MultiCam the service's pattern for garrison and general deployment use, but also to have a family of approved camouflage patterns that could be issued for specific areas of the world.Įarlier this week, UCP came under fire again in a story by The Daily, an online news site, which quoted several Army scientists from Natick Soldier Systems Center, Mass., alleging that the Army selected UCP long before testing was complete. One option would be to make MultiCam the Army's official camouflage pattern, sources tell. But officials running the camouflage effort are now looking at two options to recommend to the service's senior leadership this fall.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |